Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Matassini Law Firm
FREE Consultations Available
813-217-5715
TAMPA
Matassini Law Firm > Blog > Drug Crimes > Six Common Search Warrant Exceptions

Six Common Search Warrant Exceptions

searchwarrant

Warrantless searches are involved in almost all drug possession, weapons possession, and other such cases, unless the arrest was a culmination of a months-long investigation. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable warrantless searches. The concept of reasonableness and what it means to a given set of facts has been explored by the Courts for decades.

The United States Supreme Court has articulated two standards for determining when a Fourth Amendment search has occurred: (1) whether there has been a physical trespass or intrusion upon private property, and (2) whether the person searched had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched by government officials.

While the law goes back and forth as to the specific kinds of searches that are permissible, these categories have remained relatively constant since the Supreme Court developed the exclusionary rule in the 1960s. This doctrine states that evidence which is seized unlawfully must be excluded at trial as fruit of the poisonous tree.

Consent

This exception is probably the most common one, largely because many people do not realize that if an officer asks for permission to search a car, vehicle, or there person, they have a right to refuse consent, at least in most cases. There are a couple of rules. Most significantly, the person who gives consent must at least have apparent authority to give such permission. A roommate can give permission to search a house even if that person is not listed on the lease. However, a roommate cannot give permission to search a locked box belonging to another inside the house, because the person clearly lacks authority to give such permission. Similarly, a passenger cannot give consent to search a car, at least in most cases.

Search Incident to Arrest

Generally speaking, the law allows an officer to search your person (pockets, underwear, socks) following an arrest. Similarly, the law allows an officer to search your car if you are arrested when it is ‘reasonable to believe evidence relevant to the crime of arrest might be found in the vehicle’.

Plain View

Officers may seize contraband which is in their plain view. Such evidence is admissible only if the officer already had a legal right to be in that place and used no enhancements, such as binoculars, to bring the contraband into plain view. If the drug, weapon, or other item is only partially visible, the judge usually decides, based on the evidence, whether or not it was within “plain view” in this context.

Weapons Pat-Down

Under Terry v. Ohio, if officers have reasonable suspicion (an evidence-based hunch) to believe that the defendant is engaged in criminal activity, they may pat down the suspect’s clothes for weapons, take any contraband that they find, and potentially use it against the defendant in court.  A smart defense lawyer will argue that the officers exceeded the scope of the pat down and move to have the evidence excluded at trial.

Safety Checks

Sometimes, Florida officers go to places to check on the safety of the individuals inside, often in response to 9-1-1 calls from third parties. In these situations, they may go inside the building without a search warrant to ensure that the place is in fact secure.

Automobile Exception

If Tampa officers believe that there is evidence of a crime in a car and there is a risk that the defendant may drive off in the car, they may search it without a warrant. This exception does not apply to immobile vehicles, such as an inoperable car parked in the front yard. The rule does apply to cars, trucks, boats, and all other motor vehicles, although it’s called the “automobile exception.”

Team Up with Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Police officers can sometimes obtain evidence in violation of the law. For a free consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Tampa, contact The Matassini Law Firm, P.A. Convenient payment plans are available.

Resource:

law.cornell.edu/wex/exclusionary_rule

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

The experience you need in your pursuit of justice

The greatest distinguishing feature among attorneys is their level of experience. Our firm has more than 60 years of legal experience, much of it spent in the courtroom at trial. As a result, our Tampa personal injury lawyers rarely encounter an unfamiliar situation and can thoroughly answer your urgent questions. Our criminal defense practice features a board certified criminal trial lawyer and two former prosecutors with impressive knowledge of trial tactics and procedures.

The resources to provide quality representation for the length of your case

Whether your case involves medical malpractice, an auto accident or a wrongful death, your attorney must be prepared to take the case all the way through trial to verdict. Many personal injury attorneys advance the cost of litigation, so they can only last so long before financial pressures start to mount. As a client, you have to wonder whether an attorneyÕs advice to settle your case reflects the quality of the offer or your attorneyÕs need to get paid. Fortunately, The Matassini Law Firm has the resources to pursue civil verdicts and settlements that reflect the actual value of your case.

Call our Tampa Bay personal injury lawyers for a free consultation

A crisis in your life calls for capable and compassionate assistance. The Matassini Law Firm, P.A. addresses your needs all the way through the legal process. For your free initial confidential conference with one of our Tampa personal injury lawyers, call us today at 813-217-5715 or contact us online.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
888-377-0011
Toll Free
813-217-5715
Tampa
2811 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33609
GET DRIVING DIRECTIONS
+