Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Matassini Law Firm
FREE Consultations Available
813-217-5715
TAMPA
Matassini Law Firm > Blog > Drug Crimes > Search Warrant Requirements In Florida Drug Trafficking Cases

Search Warrant Requirements In Florida Drug Trafficking Cases

Drug2

Most federal drug trafficking prosecutions are huge cases which involve multiple law enforcement agencies. Given the size of the investment, law enforcement sometimes cuts corners to make an arrest. These shortcuts often come during the search warrant phase.

The Fourth Amendment lays out some general requirements for search warrants. But the Founding Fathers left it up to the courts to determine the specifics. Since any fourth amendment analysis is very fact specific, the law can seem like it is constantly in flux. However, the overriding issues and considerations remain much the same.

Is the Warrant Valid?

Search warrants must be based on “probable cause”. By design this phrase has no concrete legal definition. However, attorneys trained in criminal law and procedure know that it is somewhere between reasonable suspicion and proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Officers can have a reasonable suspicion to detain an individual, perhaps by pulling over his or her car, if there are specific, articulable facts which indicate criminal activity. Usually, the officer sees a legal violation, such as a traffic infraction. Other times, an officer can take a random fact, combine it with experience, and make a conclusion.

For example, in a recent Supreme Court case, an officer detained a suspect because he left a suspected drug house after a short visit. That’s pretty flimsy evidence, but the Justices upheld the stop.

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard of proof at trial. Essentially, a Hillsborough County prosecutor must present evidence that’s so overwhelming there could be no other possible conclusion other than guilty.

To get such evidence in drug trafficking cases, officers often rely upon search warrants. Often, these warrants are based on an informer’s tip. The court looks at several factors to decide if the tip was valid, such as:

  • Source: Anonymous tips are very unreliable, since even the tipster is unwilling to vouch for its legitimacy. Paid informer tips are not much better, as these sources clearly have a motive other than an arrest. Usually, courts look to the prior track record of that paid informant, if there is one.

  • Time: Drug trafficking tips have very short shelf lives. If officers learn that a transaction is going down at a certain location on Monday, they probably cannot search it the following week.

Other factors include the tip’s specificity. These factors do not include the outcome. A Tampa prosecutor cannot argue that the tip must have been valid since officers seized evidence.

Does An Exception Apply?

If a Tampa drug crimes attorney successfully invalidates the warrant, the prosecutor can have another bite at the apple. If an exception applies, the evidence may still be admissible.

If officers had reasonable, good faith belief that they were acting according to legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible under this rule.

Consent is usually the most common exception in Florida drug trafficking cases. Anyone with apparent authority can consent to a dwelling or vehicle search. That person does not have to be the owner. The key word is “apparent” authority. If officers know that a person is only an overnight guest, it’s very unlikely that the person is also an owner. Similarly, vehicle passengers hardly ever own the vehicles they are in at the time.

Other exceptions include items seized while they are within the officer’s plain view and search incident to arrest.

Join Forces with a Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Only legally obtained evidence is admissible at trial. For a free consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Tampa, contact The Matassini Law Firm, P.A. Nicholas G. Matassini is Board Certified in Criminal Trial Law and AV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

The experience you need in your pursuit of justice

The greatest distinguishing feature among attorneys is their level of experience. Our firm has more than 60 years of legal experience, much of it spent in the courtroom at trial. As a result, our Tampa personal injury lawyers rarely encounter an unfamiliar situation and can thoroughly answer your urgent questions. Our criminal defense practice features a board certified criminal trial lawyer and two former prosecutors with impressive knowledge of trial tactics and procedures.

The resources to provide quality representation for the length of your case

Whether your case involves medical malpractice, an auto accident or a wrongful death, your attorney must be prepared to take the case all the way through trial to verdict. Many personal injury attorneys advance the cost of litigation, so they can only last so long before financial pressures start to mount. As a client, you have to wonder whether an attorneyÕs advice to settle your case reflects the quality of the offer or your attorneyÕs need to get paid. Fortunately, The Matassini Law Firm has the resources to pursue civil verdicts and settlements that reflect the actual value of your case.

Call our Tampa Bay personal injury lawyers for a free consultation

A crisis in your life calls for capable and compassionate assistance. The Matassini Law Firm, P.A. addresses your needs all the way through the legal process. For your free initial confidential conference with one of our Tampa personal injury lawyers, call us today at 813-217-5715 or contact us online.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
888-377-0011
Toll Free
2811 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33609
GET DRIVING DIRECTIONS
+