Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Matassini Law Firm
FREE Consultations Available
813-217-5715
TAMPA
Matassini Law Firm > Blog > Criminal Defense > Three New Supreme Court Cases That May Affect Florida Criminal Appeals

Three New Supreme Court Cases That May Affect Florida Criminal Appeals

Courtroom

Criminal appeals are not easy to win. Even if there was a clear error before, during, or after the trial, it may not be enough to overturn the conviction. Both U.S. and federal law are quite clear that defendants are entitled to fair trials, but not perfect trials.

That being said, the United States Supreme Court will consider a few cases this term which could affect the outcome of criminal appeals in Hillsborough County. Favorable decisions often have a ripple effect. So, these cases could also affect arrest procedures, plea negotiations, and other aspects of a criminal case.

Timbs v. Indiana

In this case, the defendant was charged with felony drug trafficking. The offense carried a maximum $10,000 fine, and the defendant paid much less than that. But the state tried to seize the defendant’s $40,000 SUV under the forfeiture law. While admitting that the forfeiture was excessive, state prosecutors argued that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against excessive fines only applied to the federal government.

If the Supreme Court selectively incorporates the Eighth Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment, it could make it easier to challenge excessive fines in criminal cases. It might also be easier to challenge some probation revocation actions, a topic that the Supreme Court will consider separately in another case.

United States v. Hammond

At trial, prosecutors must establish every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. But in most probation revocation matters, prosecutors must only establish the alleged violations by a preponderance of the evidence. That’s a much lower evidentiary standard.

Sometimes, these two instances overlap. In Hammond, the government charged the defendant with possessing pornography in violation of his supervised release. At trial, prosecutors would have had to prove possession beyond a reasonable doubt. But since the charges involved a supervision violation, the burden of proof was only a preponderance of the evidence. Mr. Hammond’s lawyers argued that the higher burden of proof should apply, and they may be right.

Flowers v. Mississippi

1986’s Batson v. Kentucky outlawed the use of peremptory challenges for race-based reasons. Peremptory challenges allow lawyers to strike jurors simply because they do not like them. In most felony cases, most attorneys get six peremptory challenges per side.

2016’s Foster v. Chapman significantly expanded Batson. In Foster, prosecutors made notes next to juror’s names, like “black guy.” During closing arguments, the prosecutor asked jurors to send a message to those people in the projects and punish the defendant harshly. The Justices concluded that this indirect evidence of racial discrimination was sufficient to warrant a new trial.

The evidence of discrimination in Flowers is even more indirect. Prosecutors used five of their six peremptory challenges on black jurors, but there were no other indications of discrimination. If the Justices expand Batson once more, it will not just be easier to overturn jury verdicts. It may also be easier to successfully resolve cases with an eleventh-hour deal. If the prosecutor does not like the jury’s makeup, the prosecutor might negotiate a deal.

Rely on Experienced Lawyers

Several Supreme Court cases this term could affect your family. For a free consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Tampa, contact The Matassini Law Firm, P.A. After-hours visits are available.

https://www.matassinilaw.com/criminal-defense/four-possible-grounds-for-criminal-appeals-in-tampa/

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

The experience you need in your pursuit of justice

The greatest distinguishing feature among attorneys is their level of experience. Our firm has more than 60 years of legal experience, much of it spent in the courtroom at trial. As a result, our Tampa personal injury lawyers rarely encounter an unfamiliar situation and can thoroughly answer your urgent questions. Our criminal defense practice features a board certified criminal trial lawyer and two former prosecutors with impressive knowledge of trial tactics and procedures.

The resources to provide quality representation for the length of your case

Whether your case involves medical malpractice, an auto accident or a wrongful death, your attorney must be prepared to take the case all the way through trial to verdict. Many personal injury attorneys advance the cost of litigation, so they can only last so long before financial pressures start to mount. As a client, you have to wonder whether an attorneyÕs advice to settle your case reflects the quality of the offer or your attorneyÕs need to get paid. Fortunately, The Matassini Law Firm has the resources to pursue civil verdicts and settlements that reflect the actual value of your case.

Call our Tampa Bay personal injury lawyers for a free consultation

A crisis in your life calls for capable and compassionate assistance. The Matassini Law Firm, P.A. addresses your needs all the way through the legal process. For your free initial confidential conference with one of our Tampa personal injury lawyers, call us today at 813-217-5715 or contact us online.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
888-377-0011
Toll Free
2811 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33609
GET DRIVING DIRECTIONS
+